Automation index
How much of a Bus driver’s job can AI already do?
The timetable generates itself. Carrying 50 people, an amber light, and a child at the crossing do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Bus driver
15%
AI can already do 15% of this job.
#630 / 643
View rankingBus driver
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Run sheet, logs and clocking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Drive the route or the charter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Stops, accessibility and fare or validation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 10% | +1.8 |
Incidents, diversions and passenger care.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Pre-trip check and defect reports.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 18% | +2.5 |
Shifts, fatigue and driving rules.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 15% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- drive
- route
- load goods
- Run sheet, logs and clocking
- Drive the route or the charter
- Incidents, diversions and passenger care
- Pre-trip check and defect reports
- Shifts, fatigue and driving rules
- conductor de autobus
- bus driver
Sources for this job· O*NET 53-3052.00· ESCO/ISCO 8331
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 643
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263