Automation index
How much of a Cadastre officer’s job can AI already do?
A plan comes earlier. The plot being the one it is without inflating the value do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Cadastre officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#208 / 733
View rankingCadastre officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, the plot and the owner.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, the wall and what is not there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Value, the valuation and not inflating.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Objection, the neighbour and the boundary.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the tax and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it is the one it is, and not inflating the value.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- plots
- cadastre plans
- owners
- boundaries
- valuation papers
- property tax
- objections
- walls
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2023.00· ESCO/ISCO 2165
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141