Automation index
How much of a Camp counsellor’s job can AI already do?
An activity programme comes earlier. Nobody absconding and coming back whole do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Camp counsellor
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#609 / 743
View rankingCamp counsellor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Programme, groups and the log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Night, the one who cries and the one who absconds.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Activity, the river and not leaving them alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Food, allergies and the one who will not eat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Parents, the call and not hiding the knock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Come back whole, and not losing anyone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- camp programmes
- nights
- allergies
- groups
- the river
- logs
- parents
- absconds
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-9032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 743
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149