Automation index
How much of a Camp counsellor’s job can AI already do?
An activity programme comes earlier. Nobody absconding and coming back whole do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Camp counsellor
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#528 / 653
View rankingCamp counsellor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Programme, groups and the log.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Night, the one who cries and the one who absconds.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Activity, the river and not leaving them alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Food, allergies and the one who will not eat.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Parents, the call and not hiding the knock.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Come back whole, and not losing anyone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- camp programmes
- nights
- allergies
- groups
- the river
- logs
- parents
- absconds
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-9032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3423
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211