Automation index
How much of a Car salesperson’s job can AI already do?
A valuer and stock come earlier. Closing the deal without the car coming back do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Car salesperson
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#413 / 653
View rankingCar salesperson
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Stock, valuation and the card.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Test drive, objections and the one who will not decide.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Finance, the bank and the one who fails.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Handover, the extra and the one who argues the scratch.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The boss, the margin and not giving the discount away.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Close the deal, and it not coming back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- value cars
- test drives
- finance
- handover
- stock
- margin
- scratches
- objections
Sources for this job· O*NET 41-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 5223
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211