Automation index

How much of a Cardiologist’s job can AI already do?

Reading an ECG and a first report come earlier. Deciding on a catheter and talking to the family do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

23%

AI can already do 23% of this job.

#290 / 633

Cardiologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Read ECG, echo and tests and write the report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
Clinic, auscultation and deciding the plan. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Procedures: catheter, pacemaker, cardioversion. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	12%	+2.2
Explain risk, consent and follow-up. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
On-call, consults and ward rounds. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Clinical meeting, team and owning the diagnosis. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		23%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

29%

#57 / 633

Criminologist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Data, maps and the victimisation report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
Police, judges and the measure under debate. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		28%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low