Automation index
How much of a Cardiologist’s job can AI already do?
Reading an ECG and a first report come earlier. Deciding on a catheter and talking to the family do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Cardiologist
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#290 / 633
View rankingCardiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Read ECG, echo and tests and write the report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Clinic, auscultation and deciding the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Procedures: catheter, pacemaker, cardioversion.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Explain risk, consent and follow-up.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
On-call, consults and ward rounds.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Clinical meeting, team and owning the diagnosis.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Clinic, auscultation and deciding the plan
- Explain risk, consent and follow-up
- On-call, consults and ward rounds
- cardiologo
- cardiologist
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1212.00· ESCO/ISCO 2212
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 633
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131