Automation index
How much of a Career counsellor’s job can AI already do?
A test and a pathway come earlier. Getting that person to the interview do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Career counsellor
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#66 / 643
View rankingCareer counsellor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Profile, test and the map of possible jobs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
CV, letter and the mock interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The session, the block and the one who believes nothing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Employers, placements and the bridge to a contract.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Public employment service, training and the calls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
That they show up, and not dropping the case.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- career guidance
- write CVs
- mock interviews
- job pathway
- refer to training
- broker employers
- employability tests
- accompany to interviews
Sources for this job· O*NET 21-1012.00· ESCO/ISCO 2423
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131