Automation index
How much of a CCTV technician’s job can AI already do?
A camera plan comes earlier. Seeing the face, not the wall opposite, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
CCTV technician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#321 / 643
View rankingCCTV technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, FOV and the recorder.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Fit, focus and the backlight that blinds.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Network, PoE and the disk that fills.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Data-protection law, signs and the client who wants the whole street.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Residents, the porter and the illegal angle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
See the face, and not recording extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- focus cameras
- FOV
- PoE
- recorders
- data-protection signs
- lawful angles
- recording disks
- camera plan
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2098.00· ESCO/ISCO 7412
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211