Automation index
How much of a CCTV technician’s job can AI already do?
A camera plan comes earlier. Seeing the face, not the wall opposite, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
CCTV technician
23%
AI can already do 23% of this job.
#316 / 623
View rankingCCTV technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Plan, FOV and the recorder.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Fit, focus and the backlight that blinds.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Network, PoE and the disk that fills.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Data-protection law, signs and the client who wants the whole street.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Residents, the porter and the illegal angle.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
See the face, and not recording extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 23% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- focus cameras
- FOV
- PoE
- recorders
- data-protection signs
- lawful angles
- recording disks
- camera plan
Sources for this job· O*NET 49-2098.00· ESCO/ISCO 7412
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142