Automation index
How much of a Ceramicist’s job can AI already do?
A firing curve comes earlier. Glazing without losing the batch in the firing do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Ceramicist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#499 / 653
View rankingCeramicist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Body, mould and the curve.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Glaze, apply and the one that runs.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Kiln, atmosphere and the batch that sticks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Run, the order and the one that does not match.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The gallery, the deadline and not opening the kiln early.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Not losing the batch, and signing the curve.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- firing curves
- bodies
- ceramic moulds
- glazes
- atmosphere
- runs
- runs of glaze
- the firing
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-9195.00· ESCO/ISCO 7314
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211