Automation index
How much of a Chief executive’s job can AI already do?
A dashboard and a board note write. Deciding a layoff, a buyer, and looking the workforce in the eye do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Chief executive
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#461 / 653
View rankingChief executive
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reports, dashboards and board notes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Prep committees, agendas and follow-ups.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Decide strategy, investment and cuts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Lead the exec team and conflicts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 10% | +1.8 |
Talk to investors, unions and press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Represent the company and own the miss.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Reports, dashboards and board notes
- Prep committees, agendas and follow-ups
- Decide strategy, investment and cuts
- Lead the exec team and conflicts
- Talk to investors, unions and press
- Represent the company and own the miss
- directivo
- ceo
- director general
- consejero delegado
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 1120
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#187 / 653
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262