Automation index
How much of a CISO’s job can AI already do?
A risk dashboard comes earlier. Saying no to the business and riding out the incident do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
CISO
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#222 / 643
View rankingCISO
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Risks, policies and the control map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
The incident, the board and talk to press or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Budget, vendors and cyber insurance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Audit, ISO and briefing the board.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The business that wants to ship now, and the no.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Ride out the incident, and not lying to the board.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- risk map
- security policies
- handle incidents
- ISO 27001
- cyber insurance
- brief the board
- say no to the business
- security controls
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-3021.00· ESCO/ISCO 1330
IS WORK OVER?
Pharmacovigilance officer
27%
#186 / 643
View rankingPharmacovigilance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Case, the file and MedDRA.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Seriousness, the link and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
File, the AEMPS deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Signal, the aggregate and not playing it down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The doctor, the ADR and not arguing the story.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
If it is serious, call it. And not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ADR
- MedDRA
- AEMPS
- safety signals
- seriousness
- causality
- case files
- regulatory deadlines
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-1051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2262