Automation index
How much of a Civil protection volunteer’s job can AI already do?
A protocol and a log come earlier. A flood and getting someone out do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Civil protection volunteer
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#688 / 743
View rankingCivil protection volunteer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocols, logs and radios.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Deploy, rescue and emergency logistics.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Public, evacuation and calm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Kit, stores and maintenance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Shifts, fatigue and 112 coordination.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
Not getting in the firefighters’ way or leaving someone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Protocols, logs and radios
- Deploy, rescue and emergency logistics
- Public, evacuation and calm
- Kit, stores and maintenance
- Shifts, fatigue and 112 coordination
- proteccion civil
- civil protection
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-2022.00· ESCO/ISCO 5419
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#176 / 743
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141