Automation index
How much of a Climatologist’s job can AI already do?
A series comes earlier. Attributing the change without selling the easy headline do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Climatologist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#140 / 643
View rankingClimatologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Series, homogenise and the gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Models, scenarios and the uncertainty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Report, the headline and not selling the easy one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Field, the station and the one that moves.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The politician, the figure and not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Attribute, and not selling the headline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- climate series
- homogenise
- scenarios
- uncertainty
- headlines
- stations
- climate reports
- attribution
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2112
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131