Automation index
How much of a Climatologist’s job can AI already do?
A series comes earlier. Attributing the change without selling the easy headline do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Climatologist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#145 / 723
View rankingClimatologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Series, homogenise and the gap.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Models, scenarios and the uncertainty.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Report, the headline and not selling the easy one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Field, the station and the one that moves.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The politician, the figure and not staying quiet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Attribute, and not selling the headline.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- climate series
- homogenise
- scenarios
- uncertainty
- headlines
- stations
- climate reports
- attribution
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 2112
IS WORK OVER?
Fire investigator
22%
#412 / 723
View rankingFire investigator
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Scene, the origin and not treading it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Cause, the short and the rag.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sample, the lab and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Report, the insurer and not selling it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The judge, the hearing and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Call the cause, and not selling it to the insurer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- fire origin
- shorts
- rags
- samples
- expert reports
- insurers
- the scene
- not tread
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-2021.00· ESCO/ISCO 3119