Automation index
How much of a Collections officer’s job can AI already do?
An ageing comes earlier. Collecting without breaking the client or letting the invoice die do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Collections officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#155 / 623
View rankingCollections officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Ageing, buckets and the call.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Deal, the promissory note and the one who does not answer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Legal, the formal notice and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Sales, credit and not selling to a debtor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The default, the insolvency and not dressing the balance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Collect, and not breaking the client.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ageing
- collection calls
- promissory notes
- formal notice
- trade credit
- defaults
- debtors
- buckets
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 4214
IS WORK OVER?
Agile coach
24%
#257 / 623
View rankingAgile coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The real retro and the elephant in the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retros
- agile cadence
- unblock teams
- flow metrics
- fake agile
- agile training
- dependencies
- velocity
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421