Automation index
How much of a Collections officer’s job can AI already do?
An ageing comes earlier. Collecting without breaking the client or letting the invoice die do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Collections officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#156 / 643
View rankingCollections officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Ageing, buckets and the call.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Deal, the promissory note and the one who does not answer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Legal, the formal notice and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Sales, credit and not selling to a debtor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The default, the insolvency and not dressing the balance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Collect, and not breaking the client.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ageing
- collection calls
- promissory notes
- formal notice
- trade credit
- defaults
- debtors
- buckets
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 4214
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131