Automation index
How much of a Collections officer’s job can AI already do?
An ageing comes earlier. Collecting without breaking the client or letting the invoice die do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Collections officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#155 / 623
View rankingCollections officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Ageing, buckets and the call.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Deal, the promissory note and the one who does not answer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Legal, the formal notice and the one who hides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Sales, credit and not selling to a debtor.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The default, the insolvency and not dressing the balance.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Collect, and not breaking the client.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- ageing
- collection calls
- promissory notes
- formal notice
- trade credit
- defaults
- debtors
- buckets
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-3011.00· ESCO/ISCO 4214
IS WORK OVER?
Hydraulic engineer
27%
#164 / 623
View rankingHydraulic engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Hydrology, flows and the floodplain model.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Field, section and what LiDAR misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Drainage works, pumps and the outfall.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Water permits and the river authority.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The flood, the village and the yes to the channel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not flood, and not trusting the model alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model floodplains
- flows
- drainage
- channel works
- water permits
- pumps
- channel sections
- river authority
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142