Automation index

How much of a Colourist’s job can AI already do?

A look comes earlier. Skin that holds without eating the set do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

27%

AI can already do 27% of this job.

#141 / 673

Colourist

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Look, stills and the reference. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Session, nodes and the hard shot. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Skin, sky and not eating the set. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Delivery, HDR and the one that misses in the theatre. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The director, the ego and not loading the orange. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Skin holds, and the look does not lie. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#394 / 673

Art teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Project, the sheet and the kit. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Classroom, the one who will not dare and the one who bins it. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Technique, the mistake and not doing it for them. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Show, the corridor and not hanging only the pretty. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Staff, 'it's a soft subject', and not dropping the bar. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they get dirty, and not copying the model. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low