Automation index
How much of a Colourist’s job can AI already do?
A look comes earlier. Skin that holds without eating the set do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Colourist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#141 / 643
View rankingColourist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Look, stills and the reference.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Session, nodes and the hard shot.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Skin, sky and not eating the set.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Delivery, HDR and the one that misses in the theatre.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The director, the ego and not loading the orange.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Skin holds, and the look does not lie.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- looks
- nodes
- skin
- HDR
- stills
- the colour bay
- hard shots
- look references
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-4032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3521
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131