Automation index
How much of a Colourist’s job can AI already do?
A look comes earlier. Skin that holds without eating the set do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Colourist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#141 / 623
View rankingColourist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Look, stills and the reference.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Session, nodes and the hard shot.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Skin, sky and not eating the set.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Delivery, HDR and the one that misses in the theatre.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The director, the ego and not loading the orange.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Skin holds, and the look does not lie.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- looks
- nodes
- skin
- HDR
- stills
- the colour bay
- hard shots
- look references
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-4032.00· ESCO/ISCO 3521
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 623
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142