Automation index
How much of a Comic artist’s job can AI already do?
A paged script comes earlier. A panel that reads without the deadline eating the line do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Comic artist
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#151 / 733
View rankingComic artist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Paging, panels and the rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Pencil, ink and the one that will not close.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Colour, lettering and the balloon that will not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Delivery, the editor and the page change.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The serial, the fatigue and not recycling the same face.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it reads, and not eating the line.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- panels
- paging
- ink
- lettering
- balloons
- serials
- pencil
- page deadline
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-1013.00· ESCO/ISCO 2166
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141