Automation index

How much of a Community health worker’s job can AI already do?

A workshop and a leaflet come earlier. Reaching the person who never walks into the clinic do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

24%

AI can already do 24% of this job.

#266 / 673

Community health worker

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Health map, workshops and the calendar. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Street, doorway and the neighbour who does not come. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Vaccines, screening and referring to the clinic. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	32%	+5.1
Data, report and the health table. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The rumour, the distrust and not moralising. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they come, and not inflating workshop numbers. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		24%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

22%

#391 / 673

Spanish language teacher

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Reading, the commentary and the rubric. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low