Automation index
How much of a Competition officer’s job can AI already do?
An inspection brief comes earlier. Catching the cartel without leaking to the paper do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Competition officer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#210 / 733
View rankingCompetition officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
File, the market and the lead.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Inspection, the email and the one that is deleted.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Cartel, the evidence and not stretching it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Fine, proportion and not sinking extra.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The board, the note and not leaking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Catch the cartel, and not leaking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cartels
- competition inspections
- emails
- fines
- markets
- leads
- not leak
- evidence
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1022.00· ESCO/ISCO 2619
IS WORK OVER?
Reliability engineer
27%
#175 / 733
View rankingReliability engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- MTBF
- Pareto
- root causes
- critical spares
- RCM
- failures
- maintenance plans
- not patch twice
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141