Automation index
How much of a Compliance officer’s job can AI already do?
A matrix and a course come earlier. Telling a director no, and writing it down, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Compliance officer
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#89 / 623
View rankingCompliance officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Policies, matrices and controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 50% | +11 |
Reports, desk KYC and tracking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Investigate a case and talk to people.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Train, persuade and take pressure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 15% | +2.4 |
Regulator, audit and evidence.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
Say no and leave a record.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Policies, matrices and controls
- Reports, desk KYC and tracking
- Investigate a case and talk to people
- Train, persuade and take pressure
- Regulator, audit and evidence
- Say no and leave a record
- compliance
- cumplimiento normativo
- oficial de cumplimiento
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2619
IS WORK OVER?
Epidemiologist
31%
#34 / 623
View rankingEpidemiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Surveillance, rates and the outbreak on the map.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Studies, bias and the report for public health.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Surveys, contacts and the case interview.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Committee, the unpopular measure and the press.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Field, the care-home outbreak and dirty data.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Judgement, uncertainty and signing the alert.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- watch outbreaks
- compute rates
- epi studies
- case interviews
- map epidemics
- public-health measures
- contact tracing
- health alerts
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2263