Automation index
How much of a Composer’s job can AI already do?
A mock-up and a part come earlier. Something that sounds and can be played does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Composer
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#411 / 633
View rankingComposer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Mock-ups, parts and a first arrangement.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 40% | +7.2 |
Write, orchestrate and review with players.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 12% | +2.2 |
Director, producer and opening deadlines.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Rights, publishers and versions.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Studio, libraries and delivery.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not delivering a score that cannot be played.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Mock-ups, parts and a first arrangement
- Write, orchestrate and review with players
- Director, producer and opening deadlines
- Rights, publishers and versions
- Studio, libraries and delivery
- compositor
- composer
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-2041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2652
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641