IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Concrete finisher’s job can AI already do?

A joint set-out comes earlier. Finishing on time so the slab does not crack open do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Concrete finisher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Set-out, joints and thickness.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%32%+5.1
Pour, vibrate and float.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

22%8%+1.8
Screed, power float and the right moment.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Cure, polythene and the windy day.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The late mixer and the one who wants water.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%18%+2.9
That it does not crack open, and not adding extra water.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

14%12%+1.7
Total100%19%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • pour concrete
  • vibrate
  • float
  • shrinkage joints
  • power float
  • cure
  • screed
  • slab thickness

Sources for this job· O*NET 47-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 7114

Spanish language teacher

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Reading, the commentary and the rubric.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Writing, the paragraph and the one who will not start.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
Speaking, the fear and getting them to talk.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Spelling, the mark-up and not humiliating.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
Plagiarism, the web and not looking away.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
That they write with sense, and not copying.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%22%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • text commentary
  • writing
  • speaking
  • spelling
  • language rubrics
  • plagiarism
  • paragraphs
  • reading

Sources for this job· O*NET 25-2031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2330

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 551Power-plant operator19%
  2. 552Demolition worker19%
  3. 553Wastewater-plant operator19%
  4. 555Piling operator19%
  5. 556Recycling-plant operator19%
  6. 557Organ builder19%