Automation index
How much of a Court case manager’s job can AI already do?
A filing nudge comes earlier. Not letting the deadline die, and the judge having the order, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Court case manager
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#61 / 643
View rankingCourt case manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Drive the case, copies and the status.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Steps, notices and gazetting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Listings, diaries and the court that overflows.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The lawyer who rings, the citizen and the counter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
File, certified copy and what the senior asks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The deadline, and not letting the case die.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 29% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- drive proceedings
- serve notices
- listings
- gazetting
- certified copies
- court archive
- procedural deadlines
- serve the counter
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3411
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 643
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131