Automation index

How much of a Court case manager’s job can AI already do?

A filing nudge comes earlier. Not letting the deadline die, and the judge having the order, do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

29%

AI can already do 29% of this job.

#61 / 623

Court case manager

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Drive the case, copies and the status. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	52%	+9.4
Steps, notices and gazetting. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Listings, diaries and the court that overflows. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The lawyer who rings, the citizen and the counter. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
File, certified copy and what the senior asks. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
The deadline, and not letting the case die. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		29%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

27%

#191 / 623

Transcriber

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Audio, markers and the shift. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Transcribe, the one who mumbles and the name. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Check, timestamps and not inventing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Deadline, the urgent and not delivering dirty. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
Confidentiality, the hearing and not leaking. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
Faithful text, and not inventing. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low