Automation index
How much of a Court officer’s job can AI already do?
A summons form comes earlier. Serving it in person so the deadlines do not slip do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Court officer
21%
AI can already do 21% of this job.
#444 / 653
View rankingCourt officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Summons, notices and the day’s list.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Serve in person, attach and the one who will not open.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Courtroom, call cases and the order of the hearing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Custody of exhibits, deposits and the transfer.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The hard address and the note to the secretary.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That service is on record, and not losing the exhibit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 21% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- serve summons
- attach goods
- call cases
- keep exhibits
- gazetting
- serve in person
- move deposits
- courtroom order
Sources for this job· O*NET 33-3012.00· ESCO/ISCO 3411
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131