Automation index
How much of a Court processor’s job can AI already do?
A register and a scanned filing come earlier. Not losing the claim in the pile do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Court processor
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#75 / 643
View rankingCourt processor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Register, scanning and the case number.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Allocation, copies and service on the parties.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Letters, rogatory requests and what another court wants.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The counter, the queue and the paper that is not there.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Archive, boxes and the old file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Not losing the filing, and balancing the register.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 29% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- register filings
- scan claims
- allocate cases
- court letters
- letters of request
- court counter
- box archive
- serve the parties
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 3411
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211