Automation index
How much of a Credit analyst’s job can AI already do?
A score and a balance sheet come earlier. Saying no to a friend of the director does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Credit analyst
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#192 / 633
View rankingCredit analyst
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Scoring, accounts and a first opinion.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 48% | +9.6 |
Visit, check and ask for more papers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Committee, director and terms.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Monitoring, alerts and refinancing.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Rules, circular and documentation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not lending to someone who will not pay back.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Scoring, accounts and a first opinion
- Visit, check and ask for more papers
- Committee, director and terms
- Monitoring, alerts and refinancing
- Rules, circular and documentation
- analista de credito
- credit analyst
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-2041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2413
IS WORK OVER?
Agile coach
24%
#257 / 633
View rankingAgile coach
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Boards, metrics and the cadence design.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The real retro and the elephant in the room.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Train, unblock and the manager who will not let go.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Scale, dependencies and fake agile.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Conflict, power and not selling extra frameworks.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they stop faking it, and not inflating velocity.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 24% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- retros
- agile cadence
- unblock teams
- flow metrics
- fake agile
- agile training
- dependencies
- velocity
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1111.00· ESCO/ISCO 2421