Automation index
How much of a Criminal lawyer’s job can AI already do?
A defence brief comes earlier. Being in the cells at three without selling cheap innocence do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Criminal lawyer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#130 / 733
View rankingCriminal lawyer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
File, evidence and the brief.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Cells, the statement and not leaving them alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Trial, the jury and not overplaying it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Sentence, the plea and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The family, the headline and not leaking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Be there at three, and not selling cheap innocence.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- case files
- statements
- criminal trials
- pleas
- cells
- evidence
- not leak
- defence briefs
Sources for this job· O*NET 23-1011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2611
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 733
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149