Automation index
How much of a Criminologist’s job can AI already do?
A crime map comes earlier. Understanding why it happens there, and what to do with the repeat offender, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Criminologist
29%
AI can already do 29% of this job.
#57 / 623
View rankingCriminologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Data, maps and the victimisation report.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Profiles, reoffending and programme evaluation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, interviews and what the spreadsheet misses.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Police, judges and the measure under debate.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Prevention, the neighbourhood and the programme that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The opinion, and not selling magic recipes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- crime maps
- study reoffending
- victimisation
- evaluate programmes
- situational prevention
- criminological profiles
- reports for judges
- fieldwork
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2632
IS WORK OVER?
Cultural manager
26%
#202 / 623
View rankingCultural manager
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Programme, fees and the venue calendar.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 44% | +7 |
Grants, paperwork and sponsorship.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Artists, crew and the day the sound dies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Audience, comms and what does not fill.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The councillor, the clash and soft censorship.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Pay on time, and not leaving culture in the spreadsheet.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- programme culture
- artist fees
- justify grants
- fill the room
- sponsorship
- deal with artists
- cultural comms
- venue budget
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2431