Automation index
How much of a Cycle courier’s job can AI already do?
A job app comes earlier. Crossing the city and delivering it whole do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Cycle courier
20%
AI can already do 20% of this job.
#471 / 653
View rankingCycle courier
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
App, routes and the urgent job.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pedal, traffic and not losing the parcel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Lobby, the code and the one who will not come down.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Rain, puncture and the job that drops.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The platform, the fee and the one that does not pay time.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Deliver it whole, and not leaving it on the landing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 20% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cycle courier
- urgent jobs
- lobbies
- punctures
- courier app
- city traffic
- platform fees
- not lose the parcel
Sources for this job· O*NET 43-5021.00· ESCO/ISCO 8321
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131