Automation index
How much of a Data architect’s job can AI already do?
A lake diagram comes earlier. Data that can be used, and does not rot, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Data architect
28%
AI can already do 28% of this job.
#83 / 623
View rankingData architect
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Models, lineage and the catalogue.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Pipelines, quality and the data contract.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
The analyst who finds nothing and the mess.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Privacy, retention and the field you cannot keep.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The business, shadow IT and not building another lake.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That it gets used, and not letting raw data rot.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 28% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- model data
- lineage
- data catalogue
- data contracts
- pipeline quality
- retention
- data lakes
- privacy
Sources for this job· O*NET 15-1243.00· ESCO/ISCO 2511
IS WORK OVER?
Research scientist
27%
#139 / 623
View rankingResearch scientist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Literature review, figures and drafts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 48% | +10.6 |
Analysis, code and experiment boards.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 42% | +7.6 |
Design the study and the controls.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Run the experiment or the fieldwork.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
Lead a group, theses and authorship fights.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 15% | +2.1 |
Win funding and answer reviewers.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 16% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Literature review, figures and drafts
- Analysis, code and experiment boards
- Design the study and the controls
- Run the experiment or the fieldwork
- Lead a group, theses and authorship fights
- Win funding and answer reviewers
- cientifico
- investigador
- research scientist
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1029.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131