Automation index
How much of a Development cooperation officer’s job can AI already do?
An agreement and a frame come earlier. Aligning with the southern partner and not imposing the project do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Development cooperation officer
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#239 / 713
View rankingDevelopment cooperation officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Agreements, alignment and the SDGs on the card.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Follow-up, missions and reports to the agency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
The local partner, the counterpart and the disagreement.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Budget, currency and what stays in management.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The context that shifts and reworking the approach.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Not imposing, and accounting on both sides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cooperation agreements
- align with SDGs
- agency reports
- southern partners
- monitoring missions
- hard-currency budget
- counterparts
- accountability
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3094.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Army officer
22%
#402 / 713
View rankingArmy officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Order, the map and the section.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Field, the one who lags and the one who jumps.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Live fire, safety and not playing brave.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Logistics, the meal and the one that does not arrive.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Command, the pressure and not dressing casualties.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Get them all out, and not losing one.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- operations orders
- sections
- the map
- live fire
- meals
- casualties
- command
- field safety
Sources for this job· O*NET 55-1015.00· ESCO/ISCO 0110