IS WORK OVER?

Automation index

How much of a Development cooperation officer’s job can AI already do?

An agreement and a frame come earlier. Aligning with the southern partner and not imposing the project do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

Development cooperation officer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Agreements, alignment and the SDGs on the card.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%48%+7.7
Follow-up, missions and reports to the agency.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%36%+5.8
The local partner, the counterpart and the disagreement.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%16%+2.9
Budget, currency and what stays in management.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
The context that shifts and reworking the approach.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%18%+3.2
Not imposing, and accounting on both sides.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%14%+2.2
Total100%26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • cooperation agreements
  • align with SDGs
  • agency reports
  • southern partners
  • monitoring missions
  • hard-currency budget
  • counterparts
  • accountability

Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3094.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635

Reliability engineer

Where the time goes

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

TaskShareAIPoints
Data, MTBF and the Pareto.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%48%+8.6
Failure, the cause and not patching twice.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%40%+6.4
Spare, the critical and not hiding it.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%22%+3.5
RCM, the plan and the one that is not done.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%28%+4.5
Production, the rush and not running the tired one.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

18%14%+2.5
That it does not drop at three, and not hiding the spare.
Estimate

No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.

16%12%+1.9
Total100%27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

Skills and activities

  • MTBF
  • Pareto
  • root causes
  • critical spares
  • RCM
  • failures
  • maintenance plans
  • not patch twice

Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2112.00· ESCO/ISCO 2141

Analyse my job

Jobs with similar scores

  1. 243Chemist26%
  2. 244Copywriter26%
  3. 245Last-mile manager26%
  4. 247NGO programme officer26%
  5. 248Lathe operator26%
  6. 249Archivist25%