Automation index
How much of a Development cooperation officer’s job can AI already do?
An agreement and a frame come earlier. Aligning with the southern partner and not imposing the project do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Development cooperation officer
26%
AI can already do 26% of this job.
#212 / 633
View rankingDevelopment cooperation officer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Agreements, alignment and the SDGs on the card.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Follow-up, missions and reports to the agency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
The local partner, the counterpart and the disagreement.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Budget, currency and what stays in management.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The context that shifts and reworking the approach.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
Not imposing, and accounting on both sides.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- cooperation agreements
- align with SDGs
- agency reports
- southern partners
- monitoring missions
- hard-currency budget
- counterparts
- accountability
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-3094.00· ESCO/ISCO 2635
IS WORK OVER?
Seismologist
27%
#178 / 633
View rankingSeismologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Network, catalogue and the location.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Quake, the analysis and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Alert, civil protection and not jumping.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Field, the station and the one that dies.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The press, the rumour and not scaring.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Locate, and not over-alarming.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- quake catalogues
- locate quakes
- seismic network
- alerts
- civil protection
- stations
- rumours
- quake analysis
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-2042.00· ESCO/ISCO 2114