Automation index
How much of a Dietetic technician’s job can AI already do?
A stock menu comes earlier. Feeding the one who cannot swallow without starving them do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Dietetic technician
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#464 / 743
View rankingDietetic technician
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Menu, textures and the allergen.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Ward, the one who will not eat and the weight.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Kitchen, the change and the one who gets the puree wrong.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Educate, discharge and what is at home.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The dietitian, the plan and not jumping to a yes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they eat, and not starving them.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- textures
- allergens
- puree
- hospital menus
- food education
- ward weights
- dysphagia
- malnutrition
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 3213
IS WORK OVER?
Acoustics engineer
27%
#170 / 743
View rankingAcoustics engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Reading, the map and the standard.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Works, the insulation and what was not put in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Simulation, the model and not trusting it alone.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Report, the neighbour and not softening the dB.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The council, the licence and not dressing it.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Bring it down for real, and not selling the miracle panel.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- noise maps
- insulation
- dB
- acoustic simulations
- standards
- licences
- neighbours
- field readings
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2199.00· ESCO/ISCO 2149