Automation index
How much of a Dog trainer’s job can AI already do?
A plan and a video come earlier. A dog that does not bite, and an owner who gets it, do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Dog trainer
18%
AI can already do 18% of this job.
#570 / 653
View rankingDog trainer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Assess, plan and dog charts.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Sessions, lead and reading the animal.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 10% | +2.2 |
Train the owner, not just the dog.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Groups, reactivity and safety.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Premises, kennels and hygiene.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not leaving a dangerous dog in a home.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 14% | +2 |
| Total | 100% | 18% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Assess, plan and dog charts
- Sessions, lead and reading the animal
- Train the owner, not just the dog
- Groups, reactivity and safety
- Premises, kennels and hygiene
- Not leaving a dangerous dog in a home
- adiestrador
- educador canino
- dog trainer
Sources for this job· O*NET 39-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 5164
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131