Automation index
How much of a Dyer’s job can AI already do?
A bath recipe comes earlier. The colour as ordered without bleeding do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Dyer
22%
AI can already do 22% of this job.
#412 / 653
View rankingDyer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Recipe, bath and the sample.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Dye, stir and the one that takes uneven.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Rinse, fix and the fastness.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Job, the garment and the fibre they did not mention.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The client, the black and not bleeding on the shirt.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The colour as ordered, and not bleeding.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- bath recipes
- dye garments
- fastness
- fix colour
- samples
- fibres
- rinse
- bleeding
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-6051.00· ESCO/ISCO 7533
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#338 / 653
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211