Automation index
How much of a Education specialist’s job can AI already do?
A curriculum design and a report come earlier. Actually changing a school does not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Education specialist
25%
AI can already do 25% of this job.
#248 / 633
View rankingEducation specialist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Design schemes, rubrics and assessments.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Reports, diagnoses and school plans.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Train staff and accompany teams.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Observe class and feed back with care.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Families, inspectorate and EU projects.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 16% | +2.9 |
Not selling pedagogical fashion without a classroom.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 25% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Design schemes, rubrics and assessments
- Reports, diagnoses and school plans
- Train staff and accompany teams
- Observe class and feed back with care
- Families, inspectorate and EU projects
- pedagogo
- pedagoga
- education specialist
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351
IS WORK OVER?
Fundraiser
26%
#194 / 633
View rankingFundraiser
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Campaigns, CRM and the donor letter.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
The meeting, the no, and asking again.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Events, legacies and the member base.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Transparency, the annual report and what you can say.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The major donor, the board and the conflict of interest.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
That they give again, and not spending more than comes in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- raise funds
- donor campaigns
- member CRM
- ask for legacies
- run events
- transparency report
- major donors
- keep members
Sources for this job· O*NET 13-1131.00· ESCO/ISCO 2432