Automation index
How much of a E-learning trainer’s job can AI already do?
A SCORM course comes earlier. Someone learning without dropping at module three do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
E-learning trainer
27%
AI can already do 27% of this job.
#154 / 643
View rankingE-learning trainer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Script, SCORM and the platform.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Tutoring, the forum and the one who vanishes.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Assess, copying and the one who does not log in.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Design, the video and not drowning in text.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The client, the deadline and not delivering a dressed-up PDF.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
That they learn, and not dropping out.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- SCORM
- online tutoring
- forums
- platforms
- course script
- training videos
- assess online
- drop-out
Sources for this job· O*NET 25-9031.00· ESCO/ISCO 2351
IS WORK OVER?
Dosimetrist
22%
#336 / 643
View rankingDosimetrist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
CT, contours and the plan.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Organ at risk, the curve and not overshooting.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Physics, the check and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Fraction, the setup and the patient who is not the same.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
The oncologist, the trade-off and not signing blind.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 18% | +3.2 |
The tumour gets it, and the healthy organ does not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- dose plans
- contours
- organs at risk
- dosimetry check
- fractions
- setup
- sim CT
- DVH curves
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2036.00· ESCO/ISCO 3211