Automation index

How much of a E-learning trainer’s job can AI already do?

A SCORM course comes earlier. Someone learning without dropping at module three do not.

This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.

Task comparison

IS WORK OVER?

27%

AI can already do 27% of this job.

#153 / 623

E-learning trainer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Script, SCORM and the platform. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	48%	+8.6
Tutoring, the forum and the one who vanishes. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	40%	+6.4
Assess, copying and the one who does not log in. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	22%	+3.5
Design, the video and not drowning in text. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The client, the deadline and not delivering a dressed-up PDF. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	14%	+2.5
That they learn, and not dropping out. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	12%	+1.9
Total	100%		27%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low

IS WORK OVER?

26%

#213 / 623

NGO programme officer

Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.

The time saving for each task is estimated separately.

Task	Share	AI	Points
Design, indicators and the report. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	48%	+7.7
Justify, invoices and the donor. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	36%	+5.8
Field or neighbourhood and what does not fit the frame. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	16%	+2.9
Partners, meetings and coordination. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	28%	+4.5
The surprise, the cut and redoing the timetable. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	18%	18%	+3.2
That it works, and not inflating the indicator. Estimate No public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate.	16%	14%	+2.2
Total	100%		26%

Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low