Automation index
How much of a Embroiderer’s job can AI already do?
A pricked drawing comes earlier. Thread that tells without pulling the cloth do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Embroiderer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#481 / 633
View rankingEmbroiderer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Drawing, hoop and thread colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Stitch, raised work and the one that tangles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Machine, program and the one that eats the cloth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Finish, the back and not leaving knots.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The garment, the deadline and not changing the drawing halfway.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That the thread tells, and not pulling the cloth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- hoop
- raised work
- stitches
- threads
- the back
- machine programs
- pricked drawings
- knots
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-6051.00· ESCO/ISCO 7533
IS WORK OVER?
Copy editor
31%
#32 / 633
View rankingCopy editor
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Spelling, agreement and consistency.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Style, repetition and sentence rhythm.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 48% | +7.7 |
Queries to the author, grey areas and the house style.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Second proofs, PDF and last-minute typos.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 22% | +4 |
Deadlines with publisher, layout and translation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Judgement, not over-rewriting, and the typo that remains.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 31% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- copy-edit
- spelling and punctuation
- unify style
- catch typos
- house style
- second proofs
- author queries
- avoid over-editing
Sources for this job· O*NET 27-3041.00· ESCO/ISCO 2641