Automation index
How much of a Embroiderer’s job can AI already do?
A pricked drawing comes earlier. Thread that tells without pulling the cloth do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Embroiderer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#481 / 633
View rankingEmbroiderer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Drawing, hoop and thread colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Stitch, raised work and the one that tangles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Machine, program and the one that eats the cloth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Finish, the back and not leaving knots.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The garment, the deadline and not changing the drawing halfway.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That the thread tells, and not pulling the cloth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- hoop
- raised work
- stitches
- threads
- the back
- machine programs
- pricked drawings
- knots
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-6051.00· ESCO/ISCO 7533
IS WORK OVER?
Microbiologist
22%
#354 / 633
View rankingMicrobiologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocols, plates and a first result.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Plate, incubate and read cultures.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 20% | 12% | +2.4 |
Report to the clinician and not jump.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Quality, strains and documentation.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
Biosafety, waste and kit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 16% | +2.6 |
Not calling a negative that is a positive.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 14% | +2.2 |
| Total | 100% | 22% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- Protocols, plates and a first result
- Plate, incubate and read cultures
- Report to the clinician and not jump
- Quality, strains and documentation
- Biosafety, waste and kit
- Not calling a negative that is a positive
- microbiologo
Sources for this job· O*NET 19-1022.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131