Automation index
How much of a Embroiderer’s job can AI already do?
A pricked drawing comes earlier. Thread that tells without pulling the cloth do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Embroiderer
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#481 / 633
View rankingEmbroiderer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Drawing, hoop and thread colour.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
Stitch, raised work and the one that tangles.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Machine, program and the one that eats the cloth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Finish, the back and not leaving knots.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The garment, the deadline and not changing the drawing halfway.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
That the thread tells, and not pulling the cloth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- hoop
- raised work
- stitches
- threads
- the back
- machine programs
- pricked drawings
- knots
Sources for this job· O*NET 51-6051.00· ESCO/ISCO 7533
IS WORK OVER?
Structural engineer
26%
#204 / 633
View rankingStructural engineer
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Model, combinations and the calculation annex.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 52% | +9.4 |
Site, rebar and what was not poured that way.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Code, building regs and the sizing note.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 36% | +5.8 |
Pathology, the crack and shore or not.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
The architect, the deadline and not trimming the depth.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Sign that it stands, and not hiding the assumption.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 26% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- calculate structures
- frame model
- calculation annex
- building regs
- rebar
- structural pathology
- load combinations
- shore
Sources for this job· O*NET 17-2051.00· ESCO/ISCO 2142