Automation index
How much of a Embryologist’s job can AI already do?
A time-lapse comes earlier. Picking the embryo without mixing the file do not.
This percentage does not predict how many people will lose their jobs.
Task comparison
IS WORK OVER?
Embryologist
19%
AI can already do 19% of this job.
#510 / 653
View rankingEmbryologist
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Retrieval, oocytes and the culture.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 32% | +5.1 |
ICSI, the sperm and the one that will not fertilise.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 22% | 8% | +1.8 |
Time-lapse, the grade and picking.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Transfer, the catheter and not losing the embryo.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The file, the double check and not mixing couples.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 18% | +2.9 |
Pick it, and not mixing the file.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 14% | 12% | +1.7 |
| Total | 100% | 19% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- oocytes
- ICSI
- embryo culture
- time-lapse
- transfer
- double check
- egg retrieval
- embryo grade
Sources for this job· O*NET 29-2011.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131
IS WORK OVER?
Clinical research associate
27%
#172 / 653
View rankingClinical research associate
Where the time goes
Task weights are our estimates based on O*NET frequency data, not time shares published by O*NET.
The time saving for each task is estimated separately.
| Task | Share | AI | Points |
|---|---|---|---|
Protocol, CRF and the monitoring visit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 48% | +8.6 |
Source, the gap and the one that does not fit.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 40% | +6.4 |
Adverse event, the deadline and not delaying.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 22% | +3.5 |
Consent, the signature and the one who did not understand.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 28% | +4.5 |
The sponsor, the audit and not dressing the figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 18% | 14% | +2.5 |
Audit, and not leaving a made-up figure.EstimateNo public source provides a precise figure. This is our estimate. | 16% | 12% | +1.9 |
| Total | 100% | 27% |
Modelled workweek: 100% · Public evidence: 0% · Estimate: 100% · Confidence: Low
Skills and activities
- CRF
- monitoring
- adverse events
- informed consent
- source data
- trial audits
- clinical protocols
- site visits
Sources for this job· O*NET 11-9121.00· ESCO/ISCO 2131